Necessity, Position and View of Educational Evaluation of Faculty Members in Higher Education

Mehdi Haghighi; Moslim Cherabin; Ahmad Akbari; Mohammad Karimi

doi:10.18502/jzms.v4i2.7073

Mehdi Haghighi PhD Candidate in Educational Administration, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran
Moslim Cherabin Department of Studies in Humanities, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran
Ahmad Akbari Department of Educational Sciences, Bardaskan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bardaskan, Iran
Mohammad Karimi Department of Management, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/jzms.v4i2.7073

Keywords: Faculty evaluation, Educational quality, Systematic review

Abstract

Background: Higher education has a fundamental role in the development of societies. The main elements in the university include professors, students and the educational environment. In this research, an attempt was made to review the educational quality of professors and the factors affecting in universities.

Methods: In this systematic review, the keywords of evaluation in the educational system, teacher evaluation, student evaluation, factors affecting teacher evaluation in SID, Magiran, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Medline, Springer, Proquest databases in 2000 2019 to answer questions 5 several studies were used and finally 37 articles were selected and analyzed

Results: The results of the studies showed that the most common method of evaluation of professors is by students. Some professors are dissatisfied with the evaluation by students because they consider it harmful and at a low level and different courses are not evaluated differently. Criteria from the perspective of students and professors include motivating students, moral, behavioral, personality, professional, interpersonal and social relationships, educational and research activities, professional development, counseling and executive services, observance of educational rules, teaching methods and Scientific mastery and quality of teaching.

Conclusion: If the evaluation of educational quality in time and method and qualified people for evaluation, feedback to students, use of valid and reliable evaluation forms, accurate monitoring of evaluation are used, we will see an increase in review of teachers' educational activities.