A Comparative Study of Clinicoradiological and Functional Outcome of Calcaneal Fractures Managed by Sinus Tarsi and Extensile Lateral Approach

Pranav  Kothiyal; Kunal  Vij; Pranjal  Khatri

doi:10.18502/jost.v12i2.21515

Pranav Kothiyal Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Sri Guru Ram Rai University, Dehradun, India
Kunal Vij Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Sri Guru Ram Rai University, Dehradun, India
Pranjal Khatri Junior Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Sri Guru Ram Rai University, Dehradun, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v12i2.21515

Keywords: Calcaneus; Sinus Tarsi; Bone Fractures; Internal Fracture Fixation

Abstract

Background: Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (CFs) pose significant challenges in management. This prospective comparative study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinicoradiological and functional outcomes of the sinus tarsi approach (STA) versus the extensile lateral approach (ELA) in Sanders type II and III fractures.

Methods: Between February 2022 and August 2024, 120 patients aged 18-65 years with closed displaced intra-articular CFs (Sanders type II/III) were prospectively enrolled and randomly allocated to undergo open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) via STA or ELA (60 patients each). Outcomes included time to surgery, operative duration, restoration of Böhler’s and Gissane’s angles, complications, and functional scores [American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) and Maryland Foot Score (MFS)] at 6, 12, and 24 weeks.

Results: The STA group had significantly shorter time to surgery (mean 4 vs. 6 days, P = 0.01) and operative time (65.5 ± 10.2 vs. 85.3 ± 12.4 minutes, P = 0.001). Both approaches achieved good radiological restoration, with ELA showing marginally better postoperative Böhler’s (28.5° ± 3.2° vs. 27.8° ± 3.1°) and Gissane’s (130.2° ± 3.8° vs. 128.5° ± 3.6°, P = 0.001 for Gissane’s) angles. Complication rates were low and comparable. At 24 weeks, STA demonstrated superior AOFAS (91.0 ± 4.9 vs. 90.0 ± 5.5, P = 0.001) and MFS (90.0 ± 4.3 vs. 89.0 ± 5.2, P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Both approaches yield satisfactory outcomes, but STA provides advantages in operative efficiency and long-term functional recovery with similar complication rates. STA may be preferred for most Sanders type II and III fractures, reserving ELA for complex cases requiring greater exposure