Mean Dose Constraint in Optimization Shells of a Lung SBRT Plan Helps further Reduce Normal Lung Dose
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v13i3.22746Keywords:
Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy; Dose Falloff; Dose Gradient; Normal Lung Dose; Optimization Shells; Mean Dose Constraints.Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to explore the effect of mean dose constraint in optimization shells on the reduction of normal lung dose in lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) plans.
Materials and Methods: This study investigated 28 VMAT-based lung SBRT plans optimized with three artificial shells, which were re-generated with the same setup and an additional mean dose constraint besides the maximum dose limit. Dosimetric measurements of target volume and Organs At Risk (OARs) were compared between the original plans and re-generated ones using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test at 5% level significance (two-tailed).
Results: Replanning resulted in slight improvements in some parameters, such as R50% and the Gradient Measure (GM), which were reduced by 1.3% and 1.0%, respectively, with p < 0.05. However, there were slight increases in other parameters, such as D2cm and the maximum target dose, though these increases were not statistically significant. The Conformity Index (CI) remained nearly identical, with a mean value of 0.99 ± 0.03 for both original and re-optimized plans. Similarly, the V105% values were consistent, with mean values of 0.02 ± 0.13% in both groups. The parameters for dose deposited in normal lung tissue showed statistically significant reductions ranging from 1.0% to 1.7%. In addition, the mean dose to the spinal cord, esophagus, and skin was slightly reduced, but the mean dose to the heart showed a slight increase.
Conclusion: The study found that adding mean dose constraints to optimization shells in lung SBRT plans can reduce normal lung dose while maintaining dose conformity to the target. However, there may be slight changes in some OARs such as the spinal cord, esophagus, and skin. These changes were not statistically significant.