Clinical Significance of Rheumatologic Autoantibodies in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Lymphoma, Breast, and Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Case-Control Study

Authors

  • Amirhossein Gholamlou Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Nastaran Khodakarim Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Marzieh Ghalamkari Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Fatemeh Tajik Rostami Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Amineh salem Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hazrat-e Rasool General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v20i3.22693

Keywords:

Autoantibodies; Neoplasms; Lymphoma; Rheumatoid factor

Abstract

Background: The production of autoantibodies in cancer patients is a recognized phenomenon, yet their clinical significance and diagnostic yield remain debated. This study evaluated the frequency of rheumatologic autoantibodies in treatment-naïve patients and their association with clinical parameters.

Materials and Methods: In this case-control study, 150 treatment-naïve cancer patients (50 lymphoma, 50 breast cancer, 50 GI cancers) and 150 matched healthy controls were enrolled. A broad rheumatologic panel was performed. Clinical staging and molecular subtyping were recorded, and the 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) was also evaluated in a DLBCL subgroup to assess the prognostic weight of ANA and RF positivity.

Results: ANA and RF positivity were significantly more prevalent in cancer patients (particularly breast and lymphoma) than in controls. However, specific markers (anti-dsDNA, anti-CCP) were almost entirely negative. In lymphoma, aggressive types showed higher numerical autoantibody positivity than indolent forms, though not reaching statistical significance (p‑value <0.05). ANA and RF positivity were not significantly associated with 2-year PFS in the DLBCL subgroup (p > 0.05). In breast and GI cancers, no consistent correlation was found between ANA status and molecular subtypes or histology.

Conclusion: While ANA and RF may be positive in malignancy due to immune dysregulation, these findings are largely non-specific. In the absence of clinical rheumatic symptoms, extensive autoantibody screening does not provide additional diagnostic or prognostic value and should neither prompt a diagnosis of a rheumatic disease nor alter the oncological treatment plan.

Published

2026-09-16

Issue

Section

Articles