The Iranian National Guideline for Invasive Fungal Infections (IFI) in Hematology–Oncology: An Expert Consensus Report

  • Fereshteh Ghiasvand Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Ghasem Janbabaei Hematologic Malignancies Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Babak Arjmand Hematologic Malignancies Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Seyed Ali Mirhosseini Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mobin Mohammadi Iranian Cancer Control Center, Tehran, Iran
  • Alireza Saif Hashemi Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Pershang Nazemi Department of Infectious Diseases, Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Neda Alijani Department of Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Clinical guideline; Consensus report; Hematological malignancies; Invasive fungal infections; Prophylactic management

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections are a leading cause of death in patients with hematological malignancies and those receiving bone marrow transplants. Although standard guidelines exist globally, their direct application in Iran is not always possible due to differences in the types of common fungi and limited diagnostic and therapeutic facilities. To address this challenge, a national committee of experts in the field was formed to carefully review internationally recognized protocols published up to 2024 and solicit opinions from selected experts across the country to develop the first national guideline specifically for prophylaxis. To ensure methodological rigor, the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) framework and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were utilized. The resulting consensus established a localized risk-stratification model identifying acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) patients as high-risk, recommending posaconazole as the primary standard. Notably, the guideline advises against routine azole use in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to prevent neurotoxicity. Furthermore, a resource-tiered framework was developed for centers with varying diagnostic capabilities. The result of this effort was to present a tiered and local model that provides a practical solution for both well-equipped and limited facilities. The existence of this national guideline creates a major advantage in that treatment approaches are unified and standardized across the country. By eliminating discretionary decisions, this document helps to better manage medication use and ultimately improve patient outcomes, regardless of the city in which they are treated or the facilities they are treated at.

Published
2026-06-20
Section
Articles