Boosting Root-Canal Cleanliness: A Stereomicroscopic Study of Calcium Hydroxide Removal with a Gentlefile Finisher Brush and EDTA

Authors

  • Mohammad Ali Ketabi Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Nafiseh Golshahi Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
  • Babak Farzane Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Ali Hassanzade salmasi Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Mahdi Kiafar Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mohammad Naseri Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v23i28.22718

Keywords:

Calcium Hydroxide; Dental Pulp Cavity; Root Canal Preparation; Root Canal Therapy

Abstract

Objectives: Calcium hydroxide (CH) remnants in root canals can compromise root canal sealing, highlighting the need for effective removal techniques. This study assessed the efficacy of Gentlefile Finisher Brush (GB), in combination with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), for CH removal by stereomicroscopic evaluation.

Materials and Methods: This in vitro study evaluated CH removal from 66 extracted single-rooted mandibular incisors. After canal preparation with ProTaper up to F2 and CH application, the specimens were incubated for 10 days and randomly divided into six groups on the basis of the irrigation method and instrument used: master apical file (MAF) or GB with saline or 17% EDTA (n=15 each) and positive and negative control groups (n=3 each). The CH was removed accordingly, and the teeth were longitudinally sectioned. The residual CH was quantified under a stereomicroscope at ×10 magnification using Digimizer software to compare the efficacy of different protocols. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha=0.05).

Results: The combination of GB with 17% EDTA resulted in the lowest residual CH (8.30%±6.29%) significantly outperforming all other protocols (P<0.05). MAF with saline resulted in the highest residue (52.27%±19.24%). The Tukey’s post-hoc test confirmed that both the GB methods were significantly more effective than their MAF counterparts (P<0.05), while no significant difference was observed between the two MAF-based methods (P>0.05).

Conclusion: GB with 17% EDTA demonstrated superior efficacy in removing CH from root canals. These results highlight the importance of combining chelating irrigation with dynamic mechanical agitation to optimize intracanal cleanliness.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-20

Issue

Section

Articles