Fluorescent and Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Splatter and Settled Aerosols Generated During Three Different Orthodontic Procedures: An In Vitro Study

Vishal  Sharma; Payal  Sharma; Shubhangi  Jain; Divya  Shetty; Devicharan  Shetty; Saurabh  Juneja

doi:10.18502/fid.v22i23.18867

Vishal Sharma Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ITS dental College, Ghaziabad, India
Payal Sharma Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ITS dental College, Ghaziabad, India
Shubhangi Jain Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ITS dental College, Ghaziabad, India
Divya Shetty Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ITS dental College, Ghaziabad, India
Devicharan Shetty Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ITS dental College, Ghaziabad, India
Saurabh Juneja Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, ITS dental College, Ghaziabad, India

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v22i23.18867

Keywords: Orthodontics, Dental Debonding, Aerosol

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the magnitude of generated aerosols and the extent and intensity of splatter during three orthodontic procedures.

Materials and Methods: Ten extracted teeth were mounted in a phantom jaw. Acridine orange dye was injected into the water irrigation reservoir. For each procedure, 24 grade-I filter paper discs at 2,4,6,8,10 and 12 o’clock positions at 1, 2,3, and 4ft distances, and 5 additional discs were placed on the operator’s face shield and right arm. Three orthodontic procedures (orthodontic bonding, motorized interproximal reduction, and debonding and clean-up of adhesive remnants) were performed. After each procedure, the filter papers were left in place and the operator remained in his position for 30 minutes. The filter papers were analyzed for the amount and concentration of acridine orange dye using a stereomicroscope and a fluorescent microscope.

Results: The maximum surface area of contamination was at the 4 o’clock position at 1ft and 2ft. The minimum was at the 10 o’clock position at 1ft distance in all procedures. Contamination of filter papers was found to be maximum on the operator’s face shield and minimum on the operator’s right arm for all three procedures. The intensity of contamination was similarly maximum at 1ft. distance at the 4 o’clock and 6 o’clock positions for the first procedure and the at 4 o’clock position for the second and third procedures. It was equally minimum at 12, 8 and 10 o’clock positions at 1ft distance in all 3 procedures.

Conclusion: Orthodontic procedures can result in localized contamination, highlighting the need for protective equipment for the operator, assistant and patient.