Psychometric properties of Persian version of the research misconduct questionnaire (PRMQ)

Erfan   Shamsoddin; Leila  Janani; Kiandokht Ghamari; Payam   Kabiri; Ehsan   Shamsi Gooshki; Bita   Mesgarpour

doi:10.18502/jmehm.v13i18.4826

Erfan Shamsoddin
Leila Janani
Kiandokht Ghamari
Payam Kabiri
Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki
Bita Mesgarpour

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v13i18.4826

Keywords: Biomedical research; Psychometrics; Scientific misconduct; Research misconduct; Surveys; Questionnaires; Translation.

Abstract

Assessment of scientific misconduct is considered to be an increasingly important topic in medical sciences. Providing a definition for scientific research misconduct and proposing practical methods for evaluating and measuring it in various fields of medicine discipline are required. This study aimed at assessing the psychometric properties of Scientific Research Misconduct-Revised (SMQ-R) and Publication Pressure Questionnaires (PPQ). After translation and merging of these two questionnaires, the validity of the translated draft was evaluated by 11-member expert panel using Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Reliability of the final questionnaire, completed by 100 participants randomly chosen from medical academic members, was assessed by calculating Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The final version was named Persian Research Misconduct Questionnaire (PRMQ) and consisted of 63 question items. The item-level content validity indices of 61 questions were above 0.79, and reliability assessment showed that 6 out of 7 subscales had alpha values higher than 0.6. Hence, PRMQ can be considered an acceptable, valid and reliable tool to measure research misconduct in biomedical sciences researches in Iran.