Defensive medicine in surgical disciplines: attitudes and practices among faculty and residents at Iran University of Medical Sciences

  • Maisam Fahimi Researcher, Department of General Surgery, Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
  • Soheila Sayad Associated Professor, Department of Surgery, Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Mahshad Noroozi Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki Monash Bioethics Center, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Associated Professor, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Seyed Yahya Zarghami Assistant Professor, Division of HPB Surgery & Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Aidin Shahrezaei Researcher, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Mina Forouzandeh Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Defensive medicine; Surgical residents; Attitudes; Medical ethics; Surgeons

Abstract

Defensive medicine, driven by fear of litigation, increases healthcare costs and physician stress, particularly in high-risk specialties such as surgery. This study investigates the attitudes and practices of faculty members and residents in surgical discipline regarding defensive medicine.

In this cross-sectional study, 147 surgeons (faculty, residents, and fellows) from IUMS teaching hospitals completed a validated questionnaire assessing attitudes toward the ethicality of defensive medicine and the prevalence of defensive practices. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24, applying chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Nearly half of the participants (48.9%) considered defensive practices ethical. Common defensive behaviors included consultation referrals (47.6%), unnecessary laboratory tests (36.7%), and avoidance of high-risk procedures (44.3%). Key concerns driving defensive practices were non-expert judicial rulings (35.4%), stress related to high-risk patients (34.7%), and litigation costs (35.2%). Factors such as intervention type (32%) and lack of awareness of ethical standards (27.2%) were associated with increased defensive behaviors. General surgery (29.8%) and orthopedics (17%) reported the highest conviction rates. The results showed that defensive medicine is prevalent among surgeons at IUMS due to legal fears and low self-confidence.

Enhancing targeted education and establishing clear ethical guidelines may reduce defensive practices and improve surgical care delivery.

Published
2025-11-08
Section
Articles