Evaluation of Semi-Nested PCR Compared with Indirect-ELISA to Diagnose Human Fasciolosis

Gita  Alizadeh; Mojgan  Aryaeipour; Mehdi  Mohebali; Gholam Reza  Mowlavi; Vahid Raissi; Mohammad Bagher  Rokni

doi:10.18502/ijph.v51i3.8947

Gita Alizadeh Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mojgan Aryaeipour Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mehdi Mohebali Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Gholam Reza Mowlavi Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Vahid Raissi Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Bagher Rokni Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i3.8947

Keywords: Human fascioliasis; Semi-nested Polymerase Chain Reaction; Parasitology

Abstract

Background: We aimed to compare semi-nested PCR with indirect ELISA to diagnose human fasciolosis.

Methods: Overall, 70 serum samples were collected from different areas in Iran suspected for fascioliasis. Individuals were classified based on diagnostic of fascioliasis and habitat in endemic areas. Finally, all serum samples were tested by indirect ELISA (using secretory excretory antigen) and semi-nested PCR (using ITS1 gene). The study was conducted in the School of Publish Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2021.

Results: Significant differences were found between agreement and similarity of patients' results of indirect ELISA and semi-nested PCR 94.46% and 98.4% respectively (Cohen's kappa ≥0.6; P-value≤0.05). No cross-reactions were observed with other parasitic diseases (toxocariasis, hydatidosis, strongyloidiasis, toxoplasmosis, cutaneous leishmaniasis, taeniasis and trichinosis). 69.84% of samples were positive by both techniques. In addition, the percentage of agreement and similarity between the results of the two techniques based on habitat in endemic areas was 88.9-100% and 97.7-100%, respectively (Cohen's kappa ≥0.6; P-value≤0.05).

Conclusion: Semi-nested PCR could be a suitable method for following up on patients' treatment and a confirmatory method for ELISA as for diagnosis of human fascioliasis.