A Scientometric Perspective on Stigma Research in Medicine: A Bibliometric Review
Abstract
Background: Stigma is a critical social determinant of health, influencing individuals' access to resources, quality of life, and overall well-being. Despite its significant implications, bibliometric studies on stigma in the medical field remain sparse. We provide a comprehensive scientometric analysis of stigma research in medicine over the past 30 years, highlighting trends, key focus areas, and evolving challenges.
Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer software, utilizing data from the Scopus database. The search included articles with the keyword "stigma*" in the title, published between 1992 and 2022, within the fields of Medicine, Nursing, and Professional Health. The initial search yielded 20,284 articles, narrowed down to 7,854 relevant publications for detailed analysis. Key metrics analyzed included co-authorship, co-occurrence of keywords, and co-citation patterns.
Results: The analysis revealed a significant increase in stigma-related publications in the medical field, particularly since 2010, with a peak in 2022, largely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. The research identified nine major keyword clusters, 40 associated diseases, and 36 target groups. Persistent diseases like HIV, mental illness, addiction, and cancer continue to be strongly associated with stigma.
Conclusion: The findings underscore the evolving nature of stigma research in medicine, with an increasing focus on intersecting stigmas and their persistent impact on public health. Future research should aim to develop comprehensive models and strategies to manage and reduce stigma, particularly for diseases with enduring stigmatic associations. Collaborative efforts among policymakers, healthcare providers, and society are crucial to address the social and economic consequences of stigma and improve health outcomes.