Detection of bacterial agents causing prostate infection by culture and molecular methods from biopsy specimens

  • Ali Akbar Karami Department of Urology, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  • Amir Javadi Department of Social Sciences, School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences Qazvin,
  • Sohrab Salehi Department of Urology, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  • Neda Nasirian Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  • Amirhosein Maali Department of Immunology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
  • Maryam Bakhshalizadeh Shadkam Medical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  • Masoumeh Najari Medical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  • Zahra Rousta Medical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
  • Safar Ali Alizadeh Medical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
Keywords: Prostatitis; Pathogens; Enterobacteriaceae; 16s rDNA; Real-time polymerase chain reaction

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Prostatitis affects about 16% of men in their lifetime and sometimes leading to prostate cancer. Bacterial infections are the most common causes of prostatitis. Diagnosis of the causative agents of bacterial prostate infections plays an essential role in timely treating and preventing secondary complications. This study isolat- ed bacterial infectious agents in patients’ surgical prostate and evaluated them by routine and molecular microbiological methods.

Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 72 prostate biopsy specimens were collected from the Orology De- partmen of hospitals of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. All samples were cultured in aerobic and anaerobic condi- tions. Antibiotic susceptibility test by Kirby-Bauer standard method was performed for all isolated bacteria. In addition, all isolated bacteria were identified using 16S rDNA PCR and sanger sequencing methods. Also, TaqMan real-time PCR was applied to detect Ureaplasm aurealyticum, Mycoplasma hominins, and Mycoplasma genitalium.

Results: In conventional culture method, out of 18 positive samples, 15 samples (83.3%) were Gram-negative bacteria and 3 samples (16.6%) were Gram-positive bacteria, containing Escherichia coli (55.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.1%), En- terobacter cloacae (5.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.1%), Staphylococcus aureus (11.1%), and Enterococcus faecalis (5.5%). The results of molecular identification methods were the same as conventional culture results. Also, four patients were Ureaplasm aurealyticum, and three patients were positive for Mycoplasma hominis.

Conclusion: Most bacteria isolated from prostate specimens belonged to the Enterobacteriaceae family, especially Esch- erichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae. Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were cocci isolated in the specimens too. Also, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mycoplasma hominis were identified in prostatitis.

Published
2022-04-13
Section
Articles