Serological and bacterial prevalence of Brucella spp. in suspected patients: a risk factor analysis in North Khorasan, Iran

Niloofar  Sadooghi; Saeed  Alamian; Hamed Ghasemzadeh  Moghadam; Mohammad  Yazdanmanesh; Maryam  Dadar

doi:10.18502/ijm.v16i5.16797

Niloofar Sadooghi Department of Brucellosis, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
Saeed Alamian Department of Brucellosis, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
Hamed Ghasemzadeh Moghadam Vector-Borne Diseases Research Center, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
Mohammad Yazdanmanesh Department of Brucellosis, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
Maryam Dadar Department of Brucellosis, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v16i5.16797

Keywords: Brucellosis; Humans; Multiplex polymerase chain reaction; Blood culture; Risk factors

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Brucellosis, a zoonotic bacterial disease caused by Brucella, affects humans and domestic animals, leading to significant economic loss. This study examined suspected cases in North Khorasan, Iran, to understand the prevalence of infection and its characteristics in this region.

Materials and Methods: Blood specimens were collected from 200 patients suspected of brucellosis after obtaining in- formed consent. Serum samples were tested using RBPT, Wright, and 2-ME agglutination tests. Blood samples were cul- tured on Brucella agar, and positive cultures underwent biotyping and PCR assays. A questionnaire identified correlated risk factors.

Results: RBPT, Wright, and 2-ME tests showed 25% brucellosis seroprevalence in symptomatic patients. In contrast, the prevalence was 2.5% among those with positive blood cultures. Notably, all culture-positive patients were also serologically positive, with titers exceeding 1:320 in Wright and 2-ME tests. Most positive cases were in people in their 30s, with B. mel- itensis biovar 1 identified as the causative agent, and the results were confirmed by multiplex PCR. Significant risk factors include contact with livestock and consumption of raw milk (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The findings highlighted the importance of comprehensive diagnostic approaches for accurate identification of brucellosis. Furthermore, education regarding close contact with animals and pasteurization of dairy products is essential for controlling human brucellosis.