Ultrasound versus computed tomography scan findings in pediatric blunt abdominal traumas

  • Hasan Sultanoğlu Department of Emergency Medicine, Duzce University, Faculty of Medicine, Duzce, Turkey.
  • Ayşe Başaran Department of Emergency Medicine; Muğla Training and Research Hospital, Muğla, Turkey.
  • Azad Hekimoğlu Department of Radiology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Engin Deniz Arslan Department of Emergency Medicine, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Seda Özkan Department of Emergency Medicine, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Keywords: Abdominal Injuries; Computed Tomography; Non-penetrating Wounds; Pediatrics; Ultrasonography

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the performance of ultrasonography (US) versus computed tomography (CT) scan in detecting intra-abdominal injury among pediatric patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

Methods: Pediatric patients aged<18, who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) due to blunt abdominal trauma and underwent both US and CT scan were evaluated retrospectively.

Results: A total of 732 pediatric patients were included in this study. Pathology was detected on US of 418 (57.1%) cases, whereas, intra-abdominal pathology was detected in CT scan of 359 (48.7%) cases. The sensitivity of US in detecting pathology (fluid and/or organ injury) was 95.3%, and its specificity was 79.6%. The sensitivity of US in detecting free fluid was 94.9%, and its specificity was 80.5%. In hemodynamically unstable and stable patients, the sensitivities of US in detection of pathology (fluid and/or organ injury) were 97.6% and 91.6%, and its specificities were 74.3% and 80.9%, respectively.

Conclusion: In our study, the sensitivity of US in terms of detecting pathology in pediatrics with blunt abdominal trauma was high, whereas the specificity of US was low.

 

Published
2022-05-08
Section
Articles