https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/jmehm/issue/feed 2025-10-20T10:06:03+00:00 Admin m.davvari@knowledgee.com Open Journal Systems <p>The&nbsp;<strong><em>Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine</em></strong>&nbsp;is the official scientific publication of the&nbsp;<strong>Medical Ethics and History of Medicine of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.&nbsp;</strong>Physicians and health practitioners always deal with ethical issues in treatment and management of diseases. The advent of new biomedical technologies further complicated the moral and societal issues of medical research and practice. Religious and cultural differences more emphasize the need for nationalizing this knowledge. The&nbsp;<strong><em>Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine (J Med Ethics Hist Med)&nbsp;</em></strong>is an opportunity for healthcare professionals as well as theologians, philosophers, and sociologists to present and discuss their ideas from several aspects in relation to medical ethics and bioethics. In addition this Journal traces its roots to several aspects of History of Medicine which further emphasizes on Iranian and Islamic era.</p> <p><strong data-stringify-type="bold">All the manuscripts should be submitted through the Journal Primary Website at <a href="https://jmehm.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jmehm/about/submissions">https://jmehm.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jmehm/about/submissions</a></strong></p> https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/jmehm/article/view/20000 2025-10-20T10:06:03+00:00 Alireza Khalili none@none.com Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani none@none.com Mahshad Noroozi none@none.com Soodabeh Hoveidamanesh none@none.com Arezou Baradaran none@none.com Akram Hashemi none@none.com

<p>Professionalism impacts professional identity, staff efficiency, and patient care quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the professional behavior and climate in a teaching hospital in Iran. A cross-sectional study was performed among faculty members, nursing staff, and specialized residents. The study used the validated 30-item "Medical Professionalism Climate in Clinical Settings" questionnaire developed by Asghari et al., containing two domains: adherence to professional behavior, and perceptions of the professional climate. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. The study population consisted of 271 individuals working at a teaching hospital, 44.3% male and 55.7% female, averaging 34.79 years in age.</p> <p>The results showed there was a relationship between the total mean score, the professional behavior score, the professional climate score, and the participants' professional titles (<em>P</em>-value &lt; 0.001), as well as the duration of their work experience in the department (<em>P</em>-value: 0.005, <em>P</em>-value: 0.039, <em>P</em>-value: 0.001, respectively). The faculty members achieved the best scores, followed by the residents, nurses, and nursing assistants. Analysis of the professional behavior scores revealed strengths and weaknesses among the medical staff. More training is recommended to enhance skills and promote positive behavior to boost hospital staff's job satisfaction and sense of belonging.</p>

2025-10-20T09:54:14+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine