https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/fid/issue/feed 2024-06-15T16:27:34+00:00 Nahid Gavili n.gavili@knowledgee.com Open Journal Systems <p><strong><em>Frontiers in Dentistry (Formerly known as :Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (JDT))</em></strong>&nbsp;is the first Iranian dental journal in English.&nbsp;<strong><em>FD</em></strong>&nbsp;is an Open Access,&nbsp;Peer-Reviewed bimonthly journal published by Dental Research Center (DRC) of Tehran University of Medical Sciences which is a dynamic, rapidly growing research center.</p> <p>The Journal aims to publish novel and high quality relevant information written by peers to researchers and readers involved in all fields of dentistry, oral health sciences and related&nbsp;<span dir="LTR">interdisciplinaries,&nbsp;</span>strives to keep pace with the rapid growth of publications, and move on to the edge of knowledge in this field.</p> <p><strong data-stringify-type="bold">All the manuscripts should be submitted through the Journal Primary Website at <a href="https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/about/submissions">https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/about/submissions</a></strong></p> https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/fid/article/view/15714 2024-06-15T16:27:34+00:00 Ali Mahmoud Hashemi none@none.com Mahya Hasanzadeh none@none.com Ameen Khraisat none@none.com Marzieh Alikhasi none@none.com

<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to do a comprehensive systematic review on the comparison of digital and conventional workflows regarding prosthetic outcomes, accuracy of implant impressions, framework passivity and fit, and clinical fabrication of multi-unit implant-supported fixed restorations.</p> <p><strong>Materials and Methods: </strong>The EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published up until April 2020.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>No in-vivo article was found to compare full digital and conventional workflows regarding the accuracy of implant impressions, passivity and fit of frameworks, and prosthetic outcomes. There was no study to investigate full digital and conventional workflows for clinical fabrication of multi-unit implant-supported fixed restorations.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This empty review highlights the need for further research to compare full digital and conventional workflows for implant-supported restorations.</p>

2024-06-15T08:53:33+00:00 Copyright (c) 2024 Frontiers in Dentistry