https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/fid/issue/feed Frontiers in Dentistry 2025-07-20T09:16:09+00:00 Nahid Gavili n.gavili@knowledgee.com Open Journal Systems <p><strong><em>Frontiers in Dentistry (Formerly known as :Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (JDT))</em></strong>&nbsp;is the first Iranian dental journal in English.&nbsp;<strong><em>FD</em></strong>&nbsp;is an Open Access,&nbsp;Peer-Reviewed bimonthly journal published by Dental Research Center (DRC) of Tehran University of Medical Sciences which is a dynamic, rapidly growing research center.</p> <p>The Journal aims to publish novel and high quality relevant information written by peers to researchers and readers involved in all fields of dentistry, oral health sciences and related&nbsp;<span dir="LTR">interdisciplinaries,&nbsp;</span>strives to keep pace with the rapid growth of publications, and move on to the edge of knowledge in this field.</p> <p><strong data-stringify-type="bold">All the manuscripts should be submitted through the Journal Primary Website at <a href="https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/about/submissions">https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/about/submissions</a></strong></p> https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/fid/article/view/19206 Comprehensive Evaluation of Six Flowable Composite Resins in the Market: A Comparative Study 2025-07-20T09:16:09+00:00 Sara Abtahi none@none.com Sajjad Omidian none@none.com Yasaman Sherafatmand none@none.com Golnaz Tayebi none@none.com Alireza Ranjbar Hassani none@none.com <p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the mechanical and physical properties of six commercially available flowable dental composite resins, providing critical insights for informed material selection.</p> <p><strong>Materials and Methods: </strong>Six flowable composite resin materials namely Edge Flow (EDF), Opallis Flow (OPF), Els Flow (ELF), Denfil Flow (DFF), DX Flow (DXF), and Charisma Flow (CHF) were tested according to ISO 4049 standards. Each material underwent evaluation of depth of cure, flexural strength, solubility, water sorption, and radiopacity. Statistical analyses with ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test were conducted to identify significant differences among the six study groups (alpha=0.05).</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant material-specific differences were noted in depth of cure and flexural strength among the six study groups (P&lt;0.05). Solubility and water sorption profiles were also significantly different among the study groups (P&lt;0.05). All tested composite resins met the required radiopacity standards, ensuring accurate radiographic diagnosis and monitoring. However, none of the composite groups achieved an exact color match with the A2 reference shade.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study revealed significant differences in mechanical properties of flowable composites, particularly in depth of cure and flexural strength, underscoring the importance of selecting the appropriate material. Shade matching presented ongoing challenges, emphasizing the need for careful material selection. Future research should explore long-term clinical performance and standardized methods for handling of pre-test failures.</p> 2025-07-20T08:24:47+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Dentistry