https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/issue/feedJournal of Air Pollution and Health2024-10-27T08:21:27+00:00Nahid Gavilin.gavili@knowledgee.comOpen Journal Systems<p><strong>Journal of Air Pollution and Health</strong> is a research journal for scientists and researchers in different disciplines interested in air pollution and its impacts published by Center for Air Pollution Research (CAPR), Institute for Environmental Research (IER) in collaboration of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) and Iranian Association of Environmental Health (IAEH). The journal publishes papers on the health consequences of air pollution, innovative control systems, modern technologies, climate change, laboratory methods for measurements of air pollutants, and environmental management and policy. We publish original research, review articles, case reports, software developments and news, and letters to the editor. Papers should be original and results based on present scientific methods involving observations, modeling, and analysis.</p> <p><strong data-stringify-type="bold">All the manuscripts should be submitted through the Journal Primary Website at <a href="All%20the manuscripts should be submitted through the Journal Primary Website at">https://japh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/japh/about/submissions</a></strong></p>https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/article/view/16675Indoor/Outdoor particulate matter (respirable dust) and respirable crystalline silica source tracking in households located proximal to gold mine tailings in Johannesburg, South Africa2024-10-27T08:05:45+00:00Nkateko Makhubelenone@none.comPhoka Rathebenone@none.comThokozani Mbonanenone@none.comJeanneth Manganyinone@none.comGabriel Mizannone@none.comMasilu Daniel Masekameninone@none.com<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the concentration of Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) and respirable dust, Particulate matters (PM<sub>4</sub>) concentration in samples measured indoors and outdoors of the nine(9) selected households located proximal to gold mine tailings in Riverlea, Johannesburg.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sampling locations were separated according to grids, based on distance from the tailings; A (<500 m from the dump), B (>500m<1 km) and C (1 km-3 km). Three households were selected from each grid zone to measure indoor and outdoor PM<sub>4</sub> samples continuously over 24 h using GilAir constant sampling pumps. Samples were collected during dry and wet seasons, and respirable crystalline silica in PM<sub>4</sub> samples were analysed by an X-ray diffraction method.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean indoor and outdoor PM<sub>4</sub> mass concentrations ranged from 2.02±0.02 µg/m<sup>3</sup> to 2.26±0.02 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The dry season mean for PM<sub>4</sub> mass concentrations were higher than the wet season PM<sub>4</sub> mass concentrations in all zones. The pairwise comparison of PM<sub>4</sub> mass concentration for dry and wet seasons revealed no statistically significant difference (p<0.05). The dry season means the indoor/outdoor ratio was greater than one across all zones, suggesting indoor activities as the primary source of PM. In both seasons, the mean indoor and outdoor RCS ranged from 0.02±0.01% to 0.06±0.03%. The mean indoor and outdoor 24 h RCS concentrations in both seasons were below the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) defined 24 h ambient exposure threshold of 3 µg/m<sup>3</sup>.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The study found that PM<sub>4</sub> concentration was directly proportional to distance from the gold mine tailings. Using RCS as a signature chemical, we found a similar chemical composition in all samples collected in winter and dry season at varied distances. It is concluded that the gold mine tailings are the significant source of PM<sub>4</sub> emissions. Therefore, further dust control measures needs to be implemented at the gold mine tailings.</p>2024-10-13T06:11:40+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Air Pollution and Healthhttps://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/article/view/16676Microplastic levels in the indoor air of buildings based on plastic waste recycling in Indonesia2024-10-27T08:16:46+00:00Tri Marthy Mulyasarinone@none.comJojok Mukononone@none.comI Ketut Sudiananone@none.comNur Hilalnone@none.com<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Microplastics are a new type of contamination in the environment caused by plastic fragmentation and degradation. The generation of plastic waste increases every year, therefore efforts are made to recycle it into building materials. It is unclear how building use resulting from recycling plastic waste affects the development of microplastics in the atmosphere. The purpose of this study is to determine the airborne concentrations of microplastics in buildings constructed from recycled plastic waste.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study measured microplastic levels in the air for 30 days in a miniature building made from plastic waste. Samples taken during the dry season in Indonesia in 2023. Air sampling is carried out by passive method. Visual observation of the shape, and amount of microplastics using a microscope.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Microplastics are found in the air of building spaces made from recycled plastic waste with varying levels every day. The average level of microplasty in the air for 30 days was 30,8 particles/m<sup>2</sup>/day. Maximum microplastic rate of 63 particles/m<sup>2</sup>/day, and minimum rate of 18 particles/m<sup>2</sup>/ day. The average air temperature when sampling is 25,48 ºC, air humidity is 68,37 % and ultraviolet intensity is 860 mwatt/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microplastic levels in the air of building spaces made from recycled plastic waste that can not be identified can be identified whether they are still within safe limits or not. This is because there is no regulation in Indonesia even in the world that regulates the safe limit of microplastic levels in the environment.</p>2024-10-13T06:19:52+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Air Pollution and Healthhttps://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/article/view/16677Classroom indoor air quality and noise level assessment of different educational institutions in a university area in Bangladesh2024-10-27T08:17:55+00:00Bashirul Islamnone@none.comMehedi Hassan Masumnone@none.comAsiful Hoquenone@none.com<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The classroom environment is crucial for fostering effective learning and safeguarding teacher-student health. This study assessed the Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) and noise levels in classrooms across three institutions: a university, a secondary and higher secondary school (called a school and college), and a primary school.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Various IAQ parameters such as Particulate Matters (PM2.5 and PM10), Carbon monoxide (CO), Carbon dioxide (CO2), Total Volatile Organic Compound (TVOC), and temperature, Relative Humidity (RH), light, and noise levels were measured using calibrated instruments from February to March 2024.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>The air pollutants and noise levels varied among the institutions. The mean values of PM 2.5 (76.6 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) and PM (116.7 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) were highest The mean values of PM 2.5 (76.6 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) and PM (116.7 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) were highest in the primary school, while CO (0.82 ppm), light (92.9 lux), temperature (27.6 °C), and noise levels (77.6 dB) peaked in the school and college. University classrooms showed the maximum concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub> (804.9 ppm), TVOC (32.9 ppb), and RH (58.6%). In all institutions, PM2.5, PM10, and noise levels exceeded WHO-recommended limits, whereas CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, RH, and temperature remained within their respective standards. Light levels were below Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Correlation analysis showed significant positive correlations between PM2.5 PM<sub>10</sub>, and CO. Hazard Quotient (HQ) values for PM 2.5 and PM10 exceeded 1.0, indicating potential health risks. Variations in pollutants and noise levels among institutions may be due to classroom facilities, student density, ventilation systems, and student activities.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term exposure to IAQ pollutants and noise levels could impair cognitive function, respiratory health, and overall well-being of the students and educators. Implementing proper ventilation (e.g., HEPA filters) systems, soundproofing acoustic panels, and continuous IAQ monitoring is recommended for a safer classroom environment.</p> <p> </p>2024-10-13T06:26:22+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Air Pollution and Healthhttps://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/article/view/16678Monitoring and measuring noise pollution in urban environments (Case study: Khorramabad city)2024-10-27T08:17:37+00:00Ali Jafarinone@none.comMansour Ghadepoorinone@none.comSamira Saadatinone@none.comFaramarz Aziminone@none.com<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Environmental noise, caused by traffic, leads to increased risk of health problems. Nowadays, noise pollution is one of the most important problems in the communities which adversely affects the health. The aim of this study was to assess the noise pollution in Khorramabad city.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To measure the noise level in the city, 39 stations near to sensitive places such as hospitals, educational centers, and so on were selected. Measurements were performed, for 30 min, in the mornings (7-10 AM) and evenings (5-8 PM) using a standard sound level meter. The measurements were made on working days during the week and assuming the traffic load was the same.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>The sound level in all 39 considered stations was higher than the standard of residential-commercial in more than 90% of the stations compared to the environmental standard. The mean of sound measured in the monitored stations was equal to 68.28±2.6 dB. The maximum measured sound level belonged to station S2. In station S2, the maximum measured sound was reported as 81.72±11.3 dB. The findings showed that sound level in the evenings were slightly higher than the mornings. Also, in the evening, the highest and lowest measured sound values belonged to stations S1 and S20. The amount of measured sound level at stations S1 and S20 was equal to 80.9 and 39.7 dB, respectively. Based on findings, the highest and lowest sound recorded belonged to stations S39 and S20 which area type of stations S20 and S39 was commercial and residential, respectively.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the average level of sound pressure was higher than the permissible limit, so the necessity of planning is suggested to reduce the level of noise pollution and consequently reduce the anxiety level of citizens and increase health.</p>2024-10-13T06:29:11+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Air Pollution and Healthhttps://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/article/view/16679The effect of particle size, meteorological parameters, and building airtightness on particulate matters infiltration2024-10-27T08:20:37+00:00Fatemeh Zahednone@none.comAlireza Pardakhtinone@none.comMajid Shafiepour Motlaghnone@none.comBehrouz Mohammad Karinone@none.comAzadeh Tavakolinone@none.com<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present study analyzed the infiltration behavior of size- fractionated particles and the influencing parameters.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The studies were carried out in two apartments under varying conditions of airtightness, utilizing real-time surveillance of Particulate Matters (PM0.3, PM1.0, PM2.5, PM10), along with air exchange rates and meteorological factors. The seasonal variations of the indoor dissemination of particulate matters have been also discussed.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of correlations indicated a strong dependency of indoor Particulate Matter (PM) concentrations on outdoor levels. However, the penetration patterns varied across different particle sizes. The highest contribution to outdoor PM10 was observed for PM 2.5-10 while indoors, the predominant particle size was among the finer categories, PM0.3-1.0. Moreover, window air-tightening appeared to decrease the overall effective leakage area of the building envelope, which in turn slightly lowered the ratio of indoor to outdoor PMs as well as the infiltrability for particles of all sizes. However, this intervention did not alter the distribution of particles within indoor environments.The most penetrated particles were observed in the size range 0.3-1.0 µm and then PM<0.3 µm, and the least in the size range 2.5-10 µm.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Particle dimensions and external sources primarily influenced the degree of particle infiltration, significantly overshading the impact of weather-related factors. The relationship between indoor and outdoor particulate matter was diminished by the airtightness of windows, particularly for larger particles. No notable difference was observed in the infiltrability and indoor distribution of particles of varying sizes between the winter and fall seasons.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>2024-10-13T07:17:02+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Air Pollution and Healthhttps://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/article/view/16680Assessment of indoor air pollution in causing respiratory illness among women residing in rural areas of Mysuru2024-10-27T08:18:41+00:00Yogendra Dommasandra Rajannanone@none.comPraveen Kulkarninone@none.comPragadesh Rajaramnone@none.comSayana Basheernone@none.com<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of inefficient and harmful fuels and technology within and outside the home is the primary cause of indoor air pollution. Approximately 2.4 billion people on the planet still cook over open flames and inefficient stoves using solid fuels and kerosene. The availability of cleaner cooking options varies more in rural than in metropolitan settings. Therefore, there is a need to determine the prevalence of indoor air pollution among rural women, its association with respiratory disorders, and the frequency of respiratory illnesses among rural women residing in houses with or without indoor air pollution.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This analytical cross-sectional study was done for a period of six months from June to November 2020. The study conducted in 210 households living in the rural field practice areas of JSS Medical College, Mysuru. For the selection of villages, a multistage random sampling technique was used. Three villages are selected from the rural setting: Suttur, Hadinaru, and Kadakola. The households were included by probability proportionate to the size sampling technique. Pre-tested, semi-structured, phase and content validated questionnaires were used to obtain the details on socio-demographic characteristics, meter values of indoor air pollutants like Particulate Matters (PM1, PM2.5, PM10) and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), respectively</p> <p>with the factors affecting respiratory illness and the episodes of the illness. Data was entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS V.26.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of indoor air pollution in the present study was 13.3%. In the homes of rural women, there was a statistically significant variation in the concentration of the three particulate matter sources that cause indoor air pollution. Additionally, among the women living in rural families, there was a statistically significant difference in the concentration of PM<sub>10</sub> that caused respiratory disease.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study demonstrated the higher concentrations of pollutants such as PM10, PM2.5, and PM1.0, as well as their significant relation with indoor air pollution in rural families. To prevent indoor air pollution and its health risks, clean energy must be used for household needs.</p>2024-10-13T07:20:08+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Air Pollution and Healthhttps://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/article/view/16681Indoor air quality assessment of an existing apartment located in Indian tropical city, Bhubaneswar2024-10-27T08:21:27+00:00Soma Kalianone@none.comNibedita Mishranone@none.comPrakash Ghosenone@none.com<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A proper investigation on indoor pollution level in economical apartments is important, where the provision for ventilation is limited. A series of experiments were conducted in the houses within an existing economical apartment in Bhubaneswar, India to evaluate various pollutant levels.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Temperature, relative humidity, CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5), Formaldehyde and Total volatile organic compounds in the bedrooms and kitchens are measured by pollution meters. The experiments were conducted with doors and windows closed conditions. The readings were taken on a four consecutive working day in February 2023 at an interval of 3 h (9:00 am to 9:00 pm).</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> The day wise temperature and humidity variations inside the bedroom and kitchen shows a reverse trend. At the afternoon, the indoor temperature becomes high, while during the night time humidity becomes the highest. The day wise indoor CO<sub>2</sub> and CO variation trend is pretty similar. Both CO<sub>2</sub> and CO concentrations in bedrooms are the highest in the evening. In contrast to that CO<sub>2</sub> and CO concentrations in kitchens becomes maximum during noon time. High particulate matter concentration at outdoor and indoor is observed at the evening time. Higher formaldehyde (HCHO) and Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) concentration at the indoor is observed at noon and afternoon time.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results obtained were compared with the recommended values of World Health Organization (WHO) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAQIS). The results revealed that all measured parameters are at a higher level than the recommended values except the indoor CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations.</p>2024-10-13T07:24:02+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Air Pollution and Healthhttps://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/JAPH/article/view/16682Air pollution by BTEX and the related health risks due to the tobacco smoke, a systematic review2024-10-27T08:19:34+00:00Ali Momennone@none.comArezo Rezaeinone@none.comRoohollah Rostaminone@none.com<p>BTEX is a group of hazardous chemical compounds that include benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene. The indoor concentration of BTEX is mostly influenced by tobacco smoking, the region within the house, and seasonal variations. This systematic review analyzed studies on BTEX concentrations in indoor air, using data from Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Springer from 2010 to 2020, and performed statistical analysis with R after thorough data extraction and evaluation. Duplicate studies were removed, and disagreements during the article selection process were resolved by a third reviewer. Out of the 1351 articles obtained from the keyword search, only 13 were eventually selected for this study. The most abundant compound found in houses among BTEX was toluene, with a concentration of 13.80±16.50 µg/m<sup>3</sup>. The results indicated that the concentration of ƩBTEX in houses where smoking occurred was lower than in houses where no smoking occurred (18.52 vs. 27.66 µg/m<sup>3</sup>); However, the concentration of benzene in smoking houses was higher than in non-smoking houses (7.17±9.42 vs. 2.65±3.77 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, unpaired Wilcoxon test: p>0.05). The concentration of BTEX in houses was substantially lower than that in cafes (21.10±31.10 vs. 15,100±9740 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, unpaired Wilcoxon test: p<0.05). The urban region had the most significant accumulation of all BTEXs, with the industrial and rural sectors following suit. The findings indicated that the average concentration of BTEX in warm months (such as spring and summer) were higher than in cold months (such as fall and winter) within houses (28.50±44.30 vs. 8.60±7.77 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, unpaired Wilcoxon test: p>0.05). The findings indicated that the Cancer Risk (CR) associated with houses (3.11×10<sup>-6</sup>) and cafes (3.54×10<sup>-3</sup>) exceeded the permissible threshold. Moreover, the waterpipe cafes that utilized fruit-flavored tobacco had the greatest CR (4.98×10<sup>-3</sup>). Furthermore, the presence of smoking, regional factors, and seasonal variations did not result in an increase in the hazard quotient (HQ) in houses beyond the acceptable thresholds. Finally, smoking, seasonal variations, and region had critical impact on indoor BTEX concentrations, and they could increase the risk of carcinogenic potential in the indoor environments.</p>2024-10-13T07:26:22+00:00Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Air Pollution and Health