Study of Research Misconduct Using an Analytical Approach to the Research System of Medical Sciences

Amirhossein  Mardani; Maryam  Nakhoda; Ehsan Shamsi  Gooshki

doi:10.18502/ijme.v17i2.18598

Amirhossein Mardani PhD in Knowledge and Information Science, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Maryam Nakhoda Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki Associate Professor, Department of Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine; Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Lecturer, Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/ijme.v17i2.18598

Keywords: Research Misconduct, Research Integrity, System of Research, Medical Sciences Research, Iran.

Abstract

Since research misconduct can be considered as an adaptive reaction against the limitations, pressures, and demands arising from inappropriate functions of the research system, to manage it, the activities of the research system should be investigated and traced during the path of transferring research policies (macro level) to research development programs in institutions (meso level) and research implementation by researchers (micro level). By introducing the macro-meso-micro analytical framework, this study clarified the tasks, strategies, and activities formed at three levels of the research system of medical sciences in Iran; from macro policies of research (macro) to operational plans for the development of research in universities and research centers (meso) and researchers as research conductors (micro). For this purpose, three analytical levels of the research system were explained and defined according to the assumptions of this framework. By performing a qualitative content analysis of the relevant texts, those activities that could be useful at different levels to support the research integrity were identified and presented as different strategies. The results showed that the research system, based on the existing analytical framework, is not seen as a mere macro-system without regard to the interaction of its parts, but rather a system in which there is cross-sectional influence and interaction among the components. This approach can improve the focus, clarity, and capability to study research misconduct, and by using micro, meso, and macro levels, it can trace challenges in the interactive path of various activities and functions of the research system and their intertwining.