Transcranial magnetic stimulation/electromyography  biomarker for differential diagnosis  of adult patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizure from patients  with epileptic seizure and healthy subjects: An experimental study

Alireza  Hoomankia; Jamal  Shams; Behnam  Safarpour-Lima; Mohammadreza  Abed

doi:10.18502/cjn.v23i4.18765

Alireza Hoomankia Neuroscience Research Centre, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Jamal Shams School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Behnam Safarpour-Lima Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mohammadreza Abed Department of Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v23i4.18765

Keywords: Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures; Epileptic Seizure; TMS/EMG; Biomarkers

Abstract

Background: Epilepsy is a prevalent disease worldwide which affects 1% of the global population, making it the fourth most common disease. The primary category of epilepsy, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), can lead to significant time and financial burdens if not promptly diagnosed. Diagnosing epileptic seizures (ES) can be complex, with video electroencephalography (VEEG) monitoring, history taking, and interviews being the most effective methods. However, VEEG is costly and not always accessible. approach using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-derived indicators. The motor threshold (MT), a key brain and spinal cord excitability indicator, differentiated ES from PNES.

Methods: The study compared 24 patients with ES, 24 patients with PNES, and 24 healthy individuals in the control group, all aged between 31-57 years.

Results: The mean MT for individuals with ES and those with PNES was the same (73.5%), and there was no significant difference in the mean MT between the two groups of patients and individuals without any medical conditions (P > 0.05). The findings indicated that VEEG remained the preferred method for diagnosing various forms of epilepsy, particularly PNES.

Conclusion: The MT derived from TMS and the general assessment of motor cortex excitability may not be a suitable diagnostic criterion for distinguishing ES from PNES.